![]() ![]() Participants strongly agreed (score = 4.6/5) with processes requiring an investment in commitment, explained by two themes: sharing ownership of the work and enabling involvement. The combined qualitative and quantitative results for the other two NPT mechanisms corroborated. Participants appraised e-PHR as explained by two themes: reflecting on value and monitoring and adapting. Participants indicated that e-PHR made sense as explained by two qualitative themes: game-changing technology and sensibility of change. Reliability tests of the NPT-based instrument negated the use of scores for two of the four mechanisms. Patients, care providers, and electronic health record (EHR) and clinical leaders ( n = 27) offered a rich explanation of the implementation work. A mixed-methods investigation was utilized to explain the work required to implement e-PHR and its potential to integrate into practice. The theory provides a framework to analyze cognitive and behavioral mechanisms known to influence implementation success. Given the limited number of published interventions that become normal practice, this preimplementation evaluation of an integrated SDM personal health record system (e-PHR) was underpinned by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). Personal health records designed for shared decision making (SDM) have the potential to engage patients and provide opportunities for positive health outcomes. Health Information Science, University Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |